![]() ![]() ![]() This is the case with nasalization and/or anticipatory coarticulation, as well as regressive (anticipatory) assimilation. There are situations where it seems as if the successive organization of phonemes went hand in hand with the simultaneous nature of certain articulatory characteristics of those phonemes (the transgression of consonants and inherence of vowels in Romportl’s theory), or the given feature seems to be anticipated by the preceding segment. Sometimes speech organs produce something that the brain just ‘plans’ to produce (anticipatory speech errors). In the flow of speech, some features tend to influence the neighbouring phonemes. 89), reflect phonetic, that is, articulatory and acoustic, properties of sounds. Distinctive features, although theoretical constructs (Giegerich, 1992, p. 435) helped cover several phonetic and/or phonological processes and phenomena. Jakobson’s attempt “to analyse the distribution of distinctive features along two axes: that of simultaneity and that of successiveness” (ibid., p. 421), that is, a set of simultaneous distinctive features, has inspired many scholars. The notion of distinctive features has had a firm position in phonology since the time of the Prague Linguistic Circle and especially that of one of its representatives, Roman Jakobson, whose well-known delimitation of a phoneme as “a bundle of distinctive features” (Jakobson, 1962, p.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |